Search for: All records

Solution-processable organic materials for emerging electronics can generally be divided into two classes of semiconductors, organic small molecules and polymers. The theoretical thermodynamic limits of device performance are largely determined by the molecular structure of these compounds, and advances in synthetic routes have led to significant progress in charge mobilities and light conversion and light emission efficiencies over the past several decades. Still, the uncontrolled formation of out-of-equilibrium film microstructures and unfavorable polymorphs during rapid solution processing remains a critical bottleneck facing the commercialization of these materials. This tutorial review provides an overview of the use of nanoconfining scaffolds to impose order onto solution-processed semiconducting films to overcome this limitation. For organic semiconducting small molecules and polymers, which typically exhibit strong crystal growth and charge transport anisotropy along different crystallographic directions, nanoconfining crystallization within nanopores and nanogrooves can preferentially orient the fast charge transport direction of crystals with the direction of current flow in devices. Nanoconfinement can also stabilize high-performance metastable polymorphs by shifting their relative Gibbs free energies via increasing the surface area-to-volume ratio. Promisingly, such nanoconfinement-induced improvements in film and crystal structures have been demonstrated to enhance the performance and stability of emerging optoelectronics that will enable large-scale manufacturing of flexible, lightweight displays and solar cells. 

Optically-active optoelectronic materials are of great interest for many applications, including chiral sensing and circularly polarized light emission. Traditionally, such applications have been enabled by synthetic strategies to design chiral organic semiconductors and conductors. Here, centrosymmetric tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) crystals are rendered chiral on the mesoscale by crystal twisting. During crystallization from the melt, helicoidal TTF fibers were observed to grow radially outwards from a nucleation centre as spherulites, twisting in concert about the growth direction. Because molecular crystals exhibit orientation-dependent refractive indices, periodic concentric bands associated with continually rotating crystal orientations were observed within the spherulites when imaged between crossed polarizers. Under certain conditions, concomitant crystal twisting and bending was observed, resulting in anomolous crystal optical behavior. X-ray diffraction measurements collected on different spherulite bands indicated no difference in the molecular packing between straight and twisted TTF crystals, as expected for microscopic twisting pitches between 20–200 μm. Mueller matrix imaging, however, revealed preferential absorption and refraction of left- or right-circularly polarized light in twisted crystals depending on the twist sense, either clockwise or counterclockwise, about the growth direction. Furthermore, hole mobilities of 2.0 ± 0.9 × 10 −6 cm 2 V −1 s −1 and 1.9 ± 0.8 × 10 −5 cm 2 V −1 s −1 were measured for straight and twisted TTF crystals deposited on organic field-effect transistor platforms, respectively, demonstrating that crystal twisting does not negatively impact charge transport in these systems. 

Metal halide perovskites (MHPs) are frontrunners among solution-processable materials for lightweight, large-area and flexible optoelectronics. These materials, with the general chemical formula AMX 3 , are structurally complex, undergoing multiple polymorph transitions as a function of temperature and pressure. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of polymorphism in three-dimensional MHPs as a function of composition, with A = Cs + , MA + , or FA + , M = Pb 2+ or Sn 2+ , and X = Cl − , Br − , or I − . In general, perovskites adopt a highly symmetric cubic structure at elevated temperatures. With decreasing temperatures, the corner-sharing MX 6 octahedra tilt with respect to one another, resulting in multiple polymorph transitions to lower-symmetry tetragonal and orthorhombic structures. The temperatures at which these phase transitions occur can be tuned via different strategies, including crystal size reduction, confinement in scaffolds and (de-)pressurization. As discussed in the final section of this review, these solid-state phase transformations can significantly affect optoelectronic properties. Understanding factors governing these transitions is thus critical to the development of high-performance, stable devices. 

For organic semiconductor crystals exhibiting anisotropic charge transport along different crystallographic directions, nanoconfinement is a powerful strategy to control crystal orientation by aligning the fast crystallographic growth direction(s) with the unconfined axis(es) of nanoconfining scaffolds. Here, design rules are presented to relate crystal morphology, scaffold geometry, and orientation control in solution-processed small-molecule crystals. Specifically, organic semiconductor triisopropylsilylethynyl pyranthrene needle-like crystals with a dimensionality of n = 1 and perylene platelike crystals with n = 2 were grown from solution within nanoconfining scaffolds comprising cylindrical nanopores with a dimensionality of m = 1, representing one unconfined dimension along the cylinder axis, and those comprising nanopillar arrays with a dimensionality of m = 2. For m = n systems, native crystal growth habits were preserved while the crystal orientation in n = m direction(s) was dictated by the geometry of the scaffold. For n ≠ m systems, on the other hand, orientation control was restricted within a single plane, either parallel or perpendicular to the substrate surface. Intriguingly, control over crystal shape was also observed for perylene crystals grown in cylindrical nanopores ( n > m ). Within the nanopores, crystal growth was restricted along a single direction to form a needle-like morphology. Once growth proceeded above the scaffold surface, the crystals adopted their native growth habit to form asymmetric T-shaped single crystals with concave corners. These findings suggest that nanoporous scaffolds with spatially-varying dimensionalities can be used to grow single crystals of complex shapes.